Nita at Throwback at Trapper Creek is having computer troubles this week so I'm stepping in for her. She will be back on board soon.
By Rhonda @ Down to Earth
We run by different clocks you know. Ours at home is more a seasonal time-frame, or one that revolves around meals and sleep patterns, whereas the business clock is run to the financial year and revolves around nine-to-five and the weekend - that great payoff for putting in time during the week. We have different holidays too. In the business world, time is set aside for employees to have annual leave/vacation. There is a complete break away from the normal day to day tasks of the work place. Time is spent recovering from the past year and getting ready for the year ahead. At home, it's a different story. There are no weekends, no after hours, no over time, no vacation or annual leave. Oh, and did I mention, no pay either.
I am a trained nurse and used to work in theatre and emergency. Then I got a degree in journalism, literature and communication and became a writer. I worked as a journalist and technical writer during the 20 years before I 'retired'. I firmly believe that training is required for all work, particularly those vocations that require judicious decision making, consistently good outcomes and high standards. We would never expect a doctor to perform surgery without training and practice, and we don't want accountants without training advising banks and businesses. Yet we seem to be fine expecting our younger generations to be raised by people who aren't trained. That training was once done on the job by mothers and older women, now, on the larger scale, that has disappeared. We expect consistently good outcomes and high standards from each successive generation, but we are failing now, more than ever, to support the work of those young mothers and fathers who stay at home to raise our future citizens. Oh, and did I mention, we don't pay them either.
I don't expect to be paid to stay at home and I think it's a silly notion to believe that a country can support such community welfare payments for SAHM and Ds. It would send most countries broke. But I do expect a certain amount of training to be available to those women and men who decide against a paid career and seek instead to stay at home, teach their children, shop for bargains, mend and sew, and generally do anything to scrape the money together to do it. There used to be a subject at taught at schools called 'home economics'. It was a training in cooking and home management with a little child care thrown in. That was offered in the times when mothers still passed on that information to their daughters. Now, when the motherly teaching of the art of homemaking has all but vanished completely, and when it's needed more than ever, home economics is no where to be seen.
Well, there is an elephant in this room, ladies and gentlemen. It's the generations of children being raised without knowing how to cook or clean, let alone make a budget or bake a loaf of bread. When they leave school and have their own money, instead of saving money for a home, they have to spend most of it buying already made food to eat and chemical cleaners that poison the air all of us breathe. They don't know that soap or vinegar or bicarb could clean almost everything. They think they have to spend money to buy everything they need to live. It is not their fault, but all of us, ALL of us, suffer because of it.
Where are the responsible governments who even though they insist on training for all manner of jobs, turn their backs on this as if it doesn't mean anything. Many local governments now are teaching water harvesting, organic gardening and how to raise chickens. Why don't they see the need for cooking from scratch, mending and sewing, and parenting classes And where are all the older generations who should have been passing on their knowledge? Those older women and men who would, in the past, mentor, guide and teach. Where are our role models? All we have now are vacuous celebrities who seem to be even more useless than the rest of us. I couldn't care less if THE wedding is on or off or if that was really cocaine in her bag, I want real life, I want my grandchildren and their grandchildren to know how to live well and I want home economics back in the classrooms.
I want people to care.
At my Frugal Home workshop the other day, the ladies thanked me for sharing my knowledge. I appreciated the thanks but I asked them to step up themselves and to talk about what they're doing and teach what they know about. We all have that responsibility. We are the ones who have to start sharing what we know and being part of a world wide solution. If we want a world full of thriving sustainable communities, we need to help create them. Governments rarely lead, they follow and they do what we demand of them. Demand this.
I have no doubt that learning the skills of simple living can help heal those parts of our world that suffered through the economic crisis. Slowing down, living within our means, being genuine people, living deliberately and sharing whatever it is we can teach is a significant and radical first move for all of us. If you want mothers to pass on knowledge again, if you want fathers to be the kind of role model that children respect and want to emulate, then you need to lead them to it. All of us, not just me or you, but all of us, share this responsibility. We need to share our skills and knowledge with our younger generations and by doing so, hopefully we'll get back to caring, safe, supportive and happy neighbourhoods again.
Do you know of schools that still teach life skills, particularly home economics? I'm very keen to get a conversation going about how we pass on what we know to others. Are you doing it? if so, how? Please share your thoughts on this important subject.





11 comments:
I am part of a group that's offering some of these skills to our local alternative high school. We started a pilot program last month: every week for two hours, we're teaching a group of about ten teenagers how to plan a menu, shop on a budget, use coupons, and starting in a few weeks, we'll start making them really COOK. They're going to start with basic knife and kitchen skills and cover healthy, simple meals they can make for their families. We have someone who will teach a few weeks of crockpot meals and every student is going to get a crockpot for their family, along with some other basic tools. It's a start.
Great post Rhonda!
As a Mum of a young toddler it astounds me the amount of processed food that is available and fed to young children. I want my son to grow up knowing what vegetables look like both on the plant and how they are prepared.
I have been making some items of clothing for him and trying to regain some of the lost skills of homemaking. I tried baking bread for the first time today. I find many of my mother's group are not at all interested and was appalled to see after one Mum brought disposable bibs most the group had them the next week. Disposable is expensive not just to my pocket but to the environment and I would like to pass on to my child that there is another option.
So thanks for the blog as it is very useful for a frugal mum.
Growing up in Germany we had home economics until 10th grade and I am so glad we did. Even though I had to help cook, clean, mend, iron etc. at home, it also taught me a few extras such as knitting and sewing. I don't really know of a group in our area that teaches skills like that, but I do try to pass them on to our girls. We cook together, try to shop "money smart and nutrition smart" together and my latest endeavor is teaching them to mend their own clothing. They might not be too thrilled about it right now, but they will be down the road.
I don't have fond memories of my high school home ec class. Part of the problem was the class was required for girls (boys could take it as an elective, but few did), so in 1979, the classroom was full of annoyed young women who, whether or not we might see that cooking and sewing would be useful, felt put upon and stereotyped. I suspect my experience was common and all those annoyed girls, now middle-aged and in charge of curriculum, are why home ec has died out.
oh rhonda, you do know how to tell it! i know linking to one's own blog is a bit gouche, but you did ask for discussion, and since i wrote about the exact subject of housewife training (or lack thereof) a few months back, i can't help myself. don't know how to do the fancy link-ey thingy, but here it is,
http://apronstringz.wordpress.com/2011/08/24/master-of-fine-homemaking-arts/
A lot of churches provide training in these areas which is helpful. My local church offers parenting courses, and the church I attended before getting married had a great mentoring program where they arranged for the girls who had finished high school to be mentored by an older woman. I often feel like church is one of the few places left in society where it's not politically incorrect to want to stay at home and raise a family!
Home Economics still surrvives in a number of independant schools, thankfully. (The school I taught at before becoming a SAHM teaches 'sustainable living'- a mix of sewing, gardening and cooking).
So there is hope!
I couldn't agree more, Rhonda. Dinner of Herbs, maybe you are on to something, perhaps the key is to rename it! "Sustainable Living" may be easier to "sell" than "Home Economics" It is a trendier term.So maybe all is needed is a new name. Of course it is also the same thing!
Regards, Julia in Bowen
I'd like to brag on my sister, Annodear. A mother of teen-age sons, she's been making them sit through her "life lessons" - doing laundry, simple sewing, money management, etc. Here's a link to how they manage mealtimes at their house, where each member takes complete responsibility for dinner one night a week:
http://busy-doing-nothing.blogspot.com/2011/01/winning-food-wars.html
Interesting post Rhonda.
Funnily enough, my memories of home. ec. are very similar to Teresa's above. It was sexist and full of stereotyping that the young feminist me was not at all impressed with!!
However, I still call upon the skills I learnt in those classes to this day, and all these years later am very grateful I was made to take that class, no matter how painful it was at the time.
My teenage daughter's NSW high school has compulsory Home Economic classes in years 7 & 8 - compulsory for both boys AND girls!! The kids then get to elect whether to continue in Years 9 onwards.
She has been taught some fantastic skills in cooking and sewing in those classes, which, combined with what I can teach her, sets her up for lifetime independence.
She also gets to study agriculture at school which teaches how to raise animals and grow food. I learn a lot from her now and quizz her for tips when she comes home from each ag. class!
Perhaps my daughter's school is unusual? I haven't looked into what other state high schools offer...
But I agree with you Rhonda, these are basic life skills and we need to teach them to our kids, one way of another.
x
Hey-- I know this is an old post; I found it wandering through the archives at Simple, Frugal, Green.
For me, on this topic, the other elephant in the room is the fact that at least my culture still disproportionately expects women to do these kind of homemaking skills rather than men. So I get really sensitive when people suggest we return to the "good old days" when people knew how to do this stuff, because there's often an implicit suggestion that women should "pick up the slack". I think any successful effort to bring sewing, cooking, etc back definitely has to be non-gendered. Adults who happen to be male need to know this stuff as much as adults who happen to be female.
Also, there's hope even for people who don't grow up knowing this stuff. I basically taught myself to cook and budget once I hit college and grad school. It wasn't too hard-- I don't make anything fancy but I can definitely feed myself.
Post a Comment